|
COMMISSIONERS MEETING
July 17, 2007 The Board of County Commissioners for Cecil County met in regular session at the County Administrative Building, 107 North Street, Elkton, MD. The following members of the Board were present:
William C. Manlove, Commissioner Mark H. Guns, Vice President Rebecca J. Demmler, Commissioner Brian Lockhart, Commissioner Wayne L. Tome, Sr., Commissioner Constituting a full Board. The Board adjourned into a closed session at its July 2, 2007 work session. Motion was made by Commissioner Tome, seconded by Commissioner Lockhart to adjourn to closed session and unanimously carried, pursuant to the Annotated Code of Maryland State Government 10-508 (a) (3) and (14). The Board adjourned into a closed session at its July 17, 2007 work session. Motion was made by Vice President Guns, seconded by Commissioner Tome to adjourn to closed session and unanimously carried, pursuant to the Annotated Code of Maryland State Government 10-508 (a) and (14). The meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Cecil County, July 17, 2007 was called to order by Commissioner Manlove at 7:00 p.m. and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. The minutes from the June 19, 2007 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners were unanimously approved. The minutes from the July 2, 2007 rezoning hearing were unanimously approved. -COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS- President Manlove -commented on the Uppershore Regional meeting that he and Commissioner Demmler attended earlier in the week. Commissioner Lockhart - offered no comment. Commissioner Demmler - offered no comment. Commissioner Tome - offered no comment. Vice President - offered no comment. - TREASURER'S REPORT - Pamela Howard, Treasurer for Cecil County presented the Treasurer's Report for the period ending June 30, 2007. A copy of this report is incorporated into these minutes. - RECYCLING AWARDS - Peter Beinek, Superintendent, Solid Waste Division and Tonya Adams, Recycling Coordinator presented awards to the following for their efforts in recycling: Corron Trash Services Town of Elkton W.L. Gore Nationwide Recycling - PUBLIC HEARINGS- - AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER WATER & SEWER PLAN - WATER SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE WHITAKER WOODS SUBDIVISION, FINEBURG VILLAGE AND MEADOWRUN SUBDIVISIONS AS A W-2 SERVICE AREA - Eric Sennstrom, Director of Planning & Zoning conducted a public hearing to amend the Master Water & Sewer Plan to include the Whitaker Woods, Fineburg Village and Meadowrun Subdivisions as a W-2 service area. The amendment is being requested as a result of recent water problems in the Whitaker Woods subdivision, wherein, several wells have failed. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the amendment at the July 16, 2007 meeting. COMMENT- OPPOSITION/SUPPORT: Rupert Rossetti, commented relating to the failing stormwater management plan and urged the Board to consider alternatives such as recharge of acquifiers. Owen Thorne, commented relating to the exploration of alternative groundwater recharges. The amendment will be presented for consideration at the August 21, 2007 meeting of the Board. - TEXT AMENDMENT - CECIL COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE ADD ARTICLE V, PART XII, SECTION 160 - NEIGHBORHOOD ESSENTIAL SERVICES - Director Sennstrom conducted a public hearing relating to a proposed text amendment to the Cecil County Zoning Ordinance to add Article V Part XII, Section 160 as follows: ARTICLE V, PART XII, Section 160 Neighborhood Essential Services Neighborhood essential services shall be permitted in all zones provided: All water and sanitary sewer pump stations, shared water systems, sewage treatment facilities and/or wastewater treatment plants shall be placed in a soundproof building that utilizes the latest odor control techniques and shall be screened by a vegetative buffer meeting the Bufferyard E 1.0 standard of Appendix B. The noise emitted from the structure shall not exceed 75 dBA at the nearest property line. The Bufferyard E 1.0 standard may be modified by the Office of Planning & Zoning to a 0.75 or 0.60 when it is demonstrated that the modification will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties and that the modification will contribute to a better design. Water conveyance pipes and sewage collection pipes do not need to comply with this requirement;
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed text amendment at their July 16, 2007 meeting conditioned upon grandfathering (exempt) after final plat approval and adjoining properties receiving nor more than 65 decibels (daytime) and 55 decibels (nighttime) for noise control. The proposed amendment will be presented to the Board at their August 21, 2007 meeting for consideration.
COMMENT - OPPOSITION/APPROVAL - Mike Pugh - commented in favor of the Planning Commission's recommendation of grandfathering in current projects. Rupert Rossetti - commented in support of the lower decibel recommendation. Alice Arbuckle, Matthew Bathon Drive, Elkton, MD - commented relative to increased fees for major subdivision applications and review fees. - TEXT AMENDMENT - SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - AMEND ARTICLE III, SECTION 3.9; AMEND ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4.0,4.1.4.2; Add Appendix A - Fee Schedule, Amend Appendix B - SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE: Director Sennstrom presented a proposed text amendment to the Subdivision Regulations as follows: RELATING TO PUBLIC NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE 3.9.1 - The Public Notice sign shall contain the following information: (a) Property owner/developer, address, telephone number (b) Acreage, zoning (c) Proposed number of lots/units (d) Office of Planning and Zoning telephone number. Said notice shall be placed on the property to be subdivided prior to the RELATING TO CONCEPT PLATS 4.0.1 - For projects involving
4.0.2 - The concept plat will also be scheduled for a Technical Advisory Committee meeting for review by committee members and representatives of the developer. Concept plats for subdivision of more than ten (10) lots or more than twenty-five (25) acres from the original parcel of record, whichever is more restrictive, will be scheduled for review by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting. If, for any reason, after Technical Advisory Committee review, a concept plat is revised to propose fewer lots but the same layout, said revised concept plat does not first have to be re-reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee before being scheduled for review by the Planning Commission. Concepts Plats submitted to the Technical Advisory Committee or the Planning Commission shall adhere to the filing schedule as prescribed by the Office of Planning and Zoning. 4.0.3 - It shall be the responsibility of the
4.0.4 - The concept plat shall be checked by the 4.0.5 - No changes proposed. 4.0.6 - The Technical Advisory Committee will in general be reviewing the (a) Interior street configuration (b) Entrance locations (both street and driveways) (c) Traffic effect on existing and proposed roads (d) Water and sewer facilities (e) Feasibility of a subdivision in the area 1. Total number and size of lots 2. Effect on school district and school bus service 3. Approximate lot layout and other reserved areas, if any (f) New land development technique (g) The affect on waterways, shorelines, due to run-off, erosion, etc. (h) Consistency with the Cecil County Critical Area Program requirements. (i) Consistency with the Cecil County Forest Conservation Regulations. 4.0.7 - No changes proposed. 4.0.8 - The review by the Planning Commission of the Concept Plat 4.0.9 - Approval of the density and layout of a Concept Plat shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from the date of Planning Commission approval. Preliminary approval by the Planning Commission of any section of the Concept Plat shall extend the density approval of the Concept Plat for an additional one (1) year period from the date of said Preliminary Plat approval. 4.0.10 - The Planning Commission may, at their regular monthly meeting, grant an extension of the (a) Change in the zoning classification of the property. (b) Change in the Zoning Ordinance. (c) Change in the Subdivision Regulations. (d) Change in the Comprehensive Plan. (e) Change in the Critical Area designation of the property. (f) Change in the Critical Area Program. (g) Change in the Forest Conservation Regulations. A request for extension of the 4.0.11 - No changes proposed. 4.0.12 - No changes proposed. 4.0.13 - Required information: (a) Concept (b) A vicinity map indicating the location of the property with (c) No changes proposed. (d) No changes proposed. (e) No changes proposed. (f) No changes proposed. (g) No changes proposed. (h) No changes proposed. (i) No changes proposed. (j) No changes proposed. (k) No changes proposed.
(n) No changes proposed. (o) No changes proposed.
RELATING TO PRELIMINARY PLATS 4.1.1 - The subdivider shall prepare a Preliminary Plat of the proposed subdivision conforming with the requirements set forth in these regulations and as stipulated in Appendices A and B, and submit said plat to the 4.1.2 - No changes proposed. 4.1.3 - The 4.1.4 - No changes proposed. 4.1.5 - It shall be the responsibility of the Office of Planning and 4.1.6 - Each agency to which a plat is 4.1.7 - No changes proposed. 4.1.8 - At the regularly scheduled subdivision review meeting of the Planning Commission, the 4.1.9 - No changes proposed. 4.1.10 - The Planning Commission will act either to: approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the Preliminary Plat at a regular subdivision review meeting. A Preliminary Plat may be tabled only if the Commission feels it needs more information on some aspect of the proposal, pursuant to §4.1.14. Approval is tentative involving the general acceptability of the layout submitted and shall in no way constitute approval of the Final Plat. Preliminary Plat approval 4.1.11 - Approval shall be noted in the meeting minutes and in a letter mailed to the applicant 4.1.12 - No changes proposed. 4.1.13 - No changes proposed. 4.1.14 - No changes proposed. 4.1.15 - No changes proposed. 4.1.16 - No changes proposed. 4.1.17 - No changes proposed. 4.1.18 - The Planning Commission may, at their regular monthly meeting, grant an extension of the Preliminary approval for one (1) year upon application of the developer. If granted, said extension shall run for one (1) year from the date said extension is granted. In connection with such request, the (a) Change of adjoining land use. (b) Change in street or highway plan. (c) Change in zoning or subdivision regulations. A request for extension of a preliminary plat approval shall be filed 4.1.19 - No changes proposed. 4.1.20 - No changes proposed. 4.1.21 - > |